Sunday, September 11, 2011

Ten Years After 9/11: Do We Need Protectionism?


Minnie Bee's Rant:
      Most Americans over the age of 15 remember where they were on 9/11/2001.  In a matter of minutes, our lives were changed forever.  Ten years later, the effects of that day are present in our lives in many ways.  The Department of Homeland Security, the TSA with associated scans and pat-downs at airports, the Patriot Act,  and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -  these have become everyday fixtures in the United States. There has been relatively little disagreement among American politicians and the media that these conflicts, agencies and laws have made our country safer. No one has complained of “protectionism” in response to their establishment, although, in fact, they exist to protect the United States.

      In contrast, in the ten years since 9/11, the U.S. economy has been left largely unprotected.  Many of our present economic difficulties originated with 9/11, yet whenever there has been an attempt to encourage Americans to buy American-made products, or to reduce the influx of foreign-made products flooding U.S. markets, or to level the playing field for U.S. companies by increasing U.S. duties and tariffs on foreign-made exports,  many politicians and the media have complained that such measures are “protectionism,” as though to protect the U.S.economy is something negative.
     "Protectionism" and "isolationism" are not one and the same, although these politicians and their lackey media representatives would like us to think they are. Why?  Because it is to the advantage of wealthy, American multi-national corporations  to keep the  United States in an inequitable trade position.  By doing this,  these big corporations can outsource American jobs to foreign countries, and exploit cheap foreign labor and undervalued foreign currency - for example, pay less than $1 per hour to workers in Viet Nam -  then turn around and import these products back to the U.S. in order to sell them to Americans at huge profits.  Keeping the U.S. in a position where exporting products from a foreign country to the U.S. is inexpensive, and exporting products from the U.S. to a foreign country is expensive helps these greedy, unpatriotic corporations maximize their profits at the expense of American jobs, and to justify what they're doing.

     Economic protectionism, far from being the negative idea that has been sold to the American public, would have a positive effect.  In times of crisis, no matter whether the crisis is military, social, or economic, one must get their own house in order first. This is as true for countries as it is for individuals.  Economic protectionism would help us to get our house in order by incentivizing corporations to manufacture goods in the USA and export goods from the USA, thereby creating U.S. jobs and boosting the U.S. economy.

     On Thursday, when President Obama laid out his plan for the American Jobs Act (AJA), he mentioned that the AJA would encourage the export of USA-made goods and products to foreign countries. He also said that he was anticipating the establishment of additional free trade agreements. In the past, President Obama has talked about a "level playing field" for trade between the U.S. and foreign economies, and, in fact, has made some early efforts in that direction.  I hope the President keeps in mind that although free trade agreements can be positive, if such agreements don't contain conditions and requirements for a level playing field, they are usually detrimental, like NAFTA, to our economy. In any fair trade agreement, participating countries should have to pay fair and equitable import/export duties and tariffs.

     I believe that the American Jobs Act will help to create jobs and revitalize the economy.  I  hope that you will support the AJA,  and let your Congressional representatives know that they should pass this jobs-creating legislation.  I hope that you will also tell your representatives that you want all fair trade agreements to establish a level playing field for "Made in USA" products. This will serve to nurture and protect the U.S. economy. We can recognize that we exist in a global world, and we can do business in a global economy, but economic protectionism would be good for us and good for our country.

************
We create and keep U.S. jobs when we demand, promote, and buy Made in USA
goods and products.

This week's recommended products:

Is the weird weather we're having causing you bad hair days?  Try these Made in USA hair care products.  Remember to check labels.  Please feel free to post your own research to this blog!

·         California North Hair Care Products - Made in USA by California North, Sausalito, CA

            (http://www.californianorth.com/)

·         J Beverly Hills Hair Care Products - Made in USA by Juan Juan, Beverly Hills, CA


·         Pureology Serious Color Care - Made in USA by Purelogy Research LLC, Irvine, CA


·         Alterna Professional Haircare - Made in USA by Alterna Professional Haircare, Beverly Hills, CA



Blog Sources:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/10/business/global/10yuan.html



No comments:

Post a Comment